Tuesday, December 6, 2011

How will liberals handle the Obama impeachment after Sestakgate is exposed?

Blame it on Bush what else.|||So you have a Democrat, a member of a party you've branded as all liars, claiming he was offered a federal job to quit a race. Was that offer made on behalf of The President, or with full knowledge of The President?





You'll have to prove President Obama was directly involved to even BEGIN the process of impeachment. And even then, the charge might not be severe enough to warrant impeachment.





Good luck with your little witch hunt.|||You need proof for impeachment, that's hearsay.





And, if you actually read about it (which I'm sure you didn't because it's so much easier to react) you'll find out he doesn't accuse Obama of anything, just "the white house" offered him a position to not run.





Liberals wanted Bush impeached for war crimes and intentionally deceiving congress, Conservatives want Obama impeached because someone that works for him allegedly offered a congressman a job if he decided not to run for re-election...|||Wow.





I'm sure most people are noticing that the questions coming out of your conservative mouths this last week are just getting screwier and screwier.





Get a clue, dude!|||OBAMA WILL NOT BE IMPEACHED THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE WAR CRIMINALS OF THE PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION|||You amuse me. Please continue.|||They won't have to handle a fake scenario.|||Just look at the answers.


He didn't get his fingerprints on it.There is more room under his bus.|||In your dreams!|||Link?

No comments:

Post a Comment